• 18 Nov 2009 /  Uncategorized 3 Comments

    Well, it’s been two months since I first sent Carlsberg an email complaining
    about their driver, who was delivering to the Revolution bar. He basically
    challenged me to a fight when I asked him if he was aware that his lorry was
    illegally parked in a dangerous position (email below). A month ago, I sent another
    email, asking Carlsberg if their lack of response meant that they condoned
    the actions of their driver. A single word in an email would have denied
    it. Other than a confirmation that they had received the first email,
    there’s been nothing from them to suggest that they don’t approve.

    Maybe I should have gone over it?

    Maybe I should have gone over it?

    This morning, going down the same bit of road, there was the large Carlsberg
    delivery lorry, parked jauntily on a bit of pavement and completely blocking
    the contra-flow cycle lane. While the other cyclists swerved round him,
    head on into the oncoming path of the traffic, I stopped to take a picture.
    However he was just leaving and went past,  giving me a cheeky grin and a wave, while my phone camera was slowly chugging into operation. At least he didn’t run me over.

    So no reply from Carlsberg, and their drivers are still happily breaking the
    law and putting people’s lives at risk. The only conclusion I can draw from
    this is that at best, Carlsberg don’t care about the behaviour of their
    drivers or the people who’s lives they put at risk, or possibly, they
    actually like their drivers to be abusive, dangerous and law-breaking.

    So next time you are in the Revolution, drinking some Carlsberg carbonated
    burping water, raise a glass to the driver who delivered it, a young man who
    bravely risks other people’s lives and is quite happy to threaten people
    because he can’t be arsed to walk the few extra steps from the loading bay
    round the back.

    Here’s another picture of the lorry parked in the same place, a while ago.

    Or I could dig a tunnel under it

    Or I could dig a tunnel under it

    This is the original email I sent:

    At 7.50am this morning (16/9/09), I passed a Carlsberg lorry parked in a mandatory contra-flow cycle lane in Downing Street, Cambridge, making a delivery to the Revolution Bar [1]. His parking was not only illegal but dangerous, forcing me or any other cyclist using the cycle lane into the main road and into the path of oncoming cars.

    The driver was unloading from the back of the lorry, so I stopped and asked him if he knew he was parked illegally in a cycle lane. His reply was “Yes, I know. What are you going to do about it?”. It was a bit early in the morning for a fight with a delivery driver and I was late for work, so I left it at that.

    The follow-up:

    Hi. It’s been over a month since I made my initial complaint, and since I have not had a response from you (other than a brief email to say the
    complaint had been passed on), can I assume that Carlsberg condones (as implied by your apparent inaction) the aggressive behaviour and the illegal and dangerous parking of their drivers?

    Posted by Naich @ 11:18 am

3 Responses

WP_Blue_Mist
  • Joff Says:

    Bicycle pumps can be used as great batons for smashing headlamps of illegally parked delivery vehicles.

    Note, do NOT use a bicycle pump to smash the headlamp of an illegally parked delivery vehicle.

    Just saying.

  • Dunspookin Says:

    Send the photos to the police and complain to them that you were offered violence on the first occasion.

    The law tends not to work from the bottom up – anarchists don’t understand this tho’.

  • MCWilliam Says:

    No. But now i will. Thanks for that.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.